hapaxOS 2.12 beta A (public beta firmware)

Hapax HapaxOS
1

Hey everyone!

We’re excited to announce the public beta firmware for the upcoming hapaxOS 2.12 release.

This update is a major step forward, primarily focused on bug fixes and significant performance improvements, especially in CPU efficiency, jitter reduction and latency optimization.

We’ve undertaken a large-scale refactor of the code, which is why we’re launching this as a beta release first. Your feedback will be invaluable in ensuring stability and precise timing before the official release.

Asset 8
Asset 85001×5001 238 KB

:rocket: How to join

This is an open beta—everyone’s welcome! Simply visit the beta website website to download the latest firmware and start playing.

:warning: Important Notice

Some projects created with this firmware won’t be compatible with older OS versions. We recommend backing up your projects before upgrading.

:speech_balloon: How to send feedback

We’d love to hear your thoughts! Send all feedback to beta@squarp.net.

At this stage, we’re focusing on stability and improvements, so we won’t be considering feature requests. However, bug reports, small suggestions, and general feedback are highly appreciated.

For bug reports, please include a clear, step-by-step procedure to reproduce the issue. This helps us track down and fix problems more efficiently.

Thanks for being part of the beta!

The Squarp Instruments Team

16 Likes
3
  • Drum Mode: Added lane swap functionality.

Whats that?

4

Smells like drum spirit :love_you_gesture:

2 Likes
5

I’m excited to see this! More cpu efficiency means more cycles for new features over time.

6

I am noticing much tighter timing with track elasticity. On previous firmwares, polymeters would start to flam and drift apart after a fairly short time but on this latest beta it’s much tighter and predictable. This is exciting, thank you! Game changer

I’d love the ability to select relative time signature instead of setting BPM percentage in track elasticity, maybe some toggle between the two types because elasticity by percentage is still very useful for longer non-repeated phasing

1 Like
7

Despite all of my feature wishes, this focus on core stability is exactly the right place for Squarp to be putting their energy imho. I’m excited to try out the beta today!

9

Same question

10

att.m1XXqe0IL5ybZzSZ_MpXo90cvJMtv1aK3Ik162cku7Y
att.m1XXqe0IL5ybZzSZ_MpXo90cvJMtv1aK3Ik162cku7Y1024×309 19.6 KB

I think its this

The typo tells me its a recent thing added in a hurry :slight_smile:
Come on squarp, read your forum :wink:

1 Like
11

Thanks for the report @rv0 we will fix it!

1 Like