Hello Hivemind,
I haven’t found this exact disuccsion before (at least not with my upcoming point), so I hope it adds to the topic. As you all know, you can’t have two projects with different BPM running simultaneously. Which is kind of a bummer in a live setting, because you need to find workarounds to transition from one song to another.
Here’s my question: has anyone tried circumventing that with time elasticity? I don’t have my hapax with me at the moment, so I haven’t been able to test it, but here’s my idea.
Let’s say you have a song A at 156 BPM and a song B at 132 BPM. If you set both project to 100 BPM but adjust the time elasticity to match the desired BPM on each track, would that work? Since your project is set to 100 BPM, you simply have to calibrate the time elasticity to 156% or 132%. Then both project could play simultaneously, or at least one after the other without having to set the BPM manually.
It seems that this could work on paper, but I’m curious about possible limitations. Is it super CPU intense and may cause crashes? In which case, not a good option at all in a live setting. Can it mess up LFOs somehow? That’s not too bad in my case, but some might see that as a problem.
That’s it basically, I’m hoping to test that myself at the end of the week, but maybe someone has already done it and can tell me if it’s worth the trouble.
Cheers!