I don’t think there has been a bug in quantisation , Id update it to latest version … nothing to lose, and there are optimisations from 4.x onwards.
if its working in the test, then it is putting them on the 1/16th (or 1/4) , so im not quite sure what you mean its different to the MPC…
If you record something and have quantisation on, is it lining up with beats that you program on the Pyramid? (Id assume from previous test, it does)
in which case, it sounds like the pyramid is ‘correct’…
so Im not quite sure what you are expecting,
I don’t know why it ‘feels’ different to the MPC,
are you sure you haven’t got something like swing on?
or does the MPC alway move later, rather than bringing to closest quant boundary (so some times bring it forward)
I think what you have to determine is what is different , not ‘feel’…
Im not sure how you are comparing… and so know its different.
one thing you could do is to record audio into a daw, and look at the waveforms of both.
you don’t need to sync with the daw, just use the same tempo.
then you can align the first ‘beat’ to the grid, and see where subsequent beats are landing.
it might not be 100% (i.e. sample accurate) but you should be able to get it to 1/64 or so , which is close enough for testing.
if you do this, then perhaps this will show you can demostrate the pyramid is not doing as you expect, and so could be the subject of an issue report you can send to squarp?
but, Im guessing (and I don’t have an MPC) that the MPC and Pyramid might have slightly different quantisation settings, and perhaps this is creating misunderstanding rather than either of them being ‘wrong’